This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience, improve site performance, and gather analytics. By selecting 'Accept,' you consent to these cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.

Logo

Distal Femur Fx: ORIF(Open Reduction and Internal Fixation) vs DFR (Distal Femur Replacement Total Knee Arthroplasty)

Sponsored by University of Florida

About this trial

Last updated 9 months ago

Study ID

IRB202300246

Status

Recruiting

Type

Interventional

Phase

N/A

Placebo

No

Accepting

55 to 100 Years
All Sexes

Trial Timing

Started 3 years ago

What is this trial about?

Supracondylar femur periprosthetic fractures about a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are a catastrophic and challenging complication of TKA and unfortunately are increasing in incidence. Fixation of these fractures can be challenging due to altered anatomy for the TKA and the presence of the metallic femoral component and have a relatively high complication rate. As a result, some surgeons elect to treat these fractures with a distal femur replacement total knee arthroplasty (DFR). The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate periprosthetic femur fractures treated with ORIF or DFR and compare various outcomes measures (Get up and go times, KOOS Jr score)

What are the participation requirements?

Inclusion Criteria

* English speaking patients

* 55 years or older with Su Type II or Su Type III periprosthetic femur fractures or OTA/OA 33C or 338/3 native knee distal femur fracturing requiring surgical intervention and are medically fit to undergo surgical intervention

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with an active total knee prosthetic infection

* Patients unable to undergo surgical intervention

* Patient with an open fracture

* Non-English-speaking patients

* Oncologic/pathologic fracture

* Poly-trauma patient (or other associated major orthopaedic injuries)