PeriviAble DeLiveries: ALIgning PArental aNd PhysiCian PrioritiEs (ALLIANCE)
Sponsored by Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
About this trial
Last updated 2 years ago
Study ID
B01416
Status
Recruiting
Type
Observational
Placebo
No
Accepting
22 to 24 Years
All
Not accepting
Healthy Volunteers
Trial Timing
Ended 4 months ago
What is this trial about?
Background:
There is significant variation in how clinicians currently present information to parents
in periviable labour. Whilst each conversation with an individual set of parents will
vary, the current level of variation is extreme. In collaborative discussions with the
neonatal parental advisory group whilst designing this project, parents reported numerous
experiences of significant variation in practice between clinicians in relation to
periviable delivery management. There is a pressing issue of injustice here as the
hospital or clinician the parent presents to in labour should not restrict their access
to information and options for management at delivery.
Parents should be empowered and engaged in making an individualised decision for their
infant. However, this is not possible if information is not accurately presented to them.
There is a gap in knowledge about what information is vital to include in periviable
decision-making conversations between parents and healthcare professionals. This study
aims to address this important gap in knowledge.
Research Question: How can information sharing and decision-making conversations between
healthcare professionals and parents prior to periviable birth be improved?
Research Aims:
1. To gain understanding of current UK-wide antenatal optimisation practices for
infants born at periviable gestations.
2. To establish an evidence-based conversational structure for pre-delivery periviable
decision-making discussions, and a prioritised set of key discussion topics derived
from parental consensus and clinician input.
3. To develop a set of parent and clinician derived recommendations to improve
pre-delivery periviable decision-making conversations.
Methodology:
The study would progress along the following structure:
1. Literature Review of literature related to how and what information is presented to
parents facing periviable labour by healthcare professionals.
2. Semi-structured interviews with clinicians and parents. The aim will be to determine
an evidence-based set of priorities for each group and identify the differences in
priorities and barriers that exist in communication between parents and clinicians.
3. National Evaluation of current periviable management practices across the UK. This
will benchmark and expose variation in current practice.
4. Analysis of pre-delivery periviable conversations.
5. Focus groups with parents and clinicians to consolidate and stratify key priority
themes for periviable decision-making conversations and assess acceptability of
developing parent-centred periviable delivery resources.
6. Parent survey of parent-assessed long-term outcomes for periviable delivery
survivors.
Impact and Dissemination:
This study will investigate the key topic areas and conversational structure of
pre-delivery periviable decision-making conversations, aiming to provide evidence-based
recommendations for improvement.
What are the participation requirements?
Inclusion Criteria
- Infants born at periviable gestation. For this study periviability is defined as 22+0 - 24+6 weeks gestation.
Exclusion Criteria
- Infants <22+0 or >24+6 weeks gestation. Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria apply to each phase of the study.
Locations
Location
Status
Recruiting